Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thornton v. Hay

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1969PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

William and Georgianna Hay, the owners of a tourist facility at Cannon Beach, appeal from a decree which enjoins them from constructing fences or other improvements in the dry-sand area between the sixteen-foot elevation contour line and the ordinary high-tide line of the Pacific Ocean.

The issue is whether the state has the power to prevent the defendant landowners from enclosing the dry-sand area contained within the legal description of their ocean-front property.

The state asserts two theories: (1) the landowners’ record title to the disputed area is encumbered by a superior right in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Feldman Et Ux. v. Knapp Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Bowlby v. ShivelyOregon Supreme Court · 1892

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Borough of Neptune City v. Borough of Avon-By-The-SeaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  2. Gion v. City of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Severance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Public Access Shoreline Hawaii ex rel. Rothstein v. Hawai'i County Planning Commission ex rel. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Matthews v. Bay Head Improvement Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API