Legal Opinion

City of Winston-Salem v. Winston-Salem City Coach Lines, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1956No. 383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

The defendant was authorized to file the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to the provisions of the above Rule, if the order overruling its demurrer, in its opinion, will prejudicially,affect a substantial right to which it is entitled unless the ruling of the court is reviewed on appeal prior to the trial of the cause on its merits. Such writ was allowed by the Court in its discretion. Ordinarily, such writ will not eliminate the necessity for the preservation of exceptions, entered in the court below, bearing on the question or questions sought to be reviewed. The allowance of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Carolina Motor Service, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Burke Transit Co. v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Austin v. BrunnemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Chambers v. ZONING BD. OF ADJUST. OF WINSTON-SALEMSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Lowry v. DillinghamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API