Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. City of Greensboro
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided June 6, 1956No. 606PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
This appeal turns upon the determination of the following question: Was the Commission correct in allowing the increase requested by the petitioner, which increase has been determined to be sufficient to produce a return of only 2.9 per cent upon the value of applicant’s bus transportation properties used and useful in rendering passenger service in the City of Greensboro and vicinity, without considering the value of its electric properties, since its franchise contains the following provision: “This franchise is granted as an individual unit and forfeiture by the company of one or more…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Simpson v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. McCueSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Norfolk and Western Railway Company v. Conley, Attorney General of the State of West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Municipal Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Proposed Increased Intrastate Industrial Sand RatesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Piedmont Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Service Co. of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- City of Winston-Salem v. Winston-Salem City Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.