Legal Opinion

Burke Transit Co. v. Queen City Coach Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeviN, J.

The defendants’ appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of the evidence offered to justify the issuance of a temporary restraining order pending the trial of the action.

The defendants base their objection to the order entered below principally on three grounds ydiich we will consider seriatim.

1. It is contended that the equitable remedy by injunction should not be invoked to restrain alleged slanderous statements affecting plaintiff’s business, but that plaintiff should be left to its remedy at law. Undoubtedly the general rule is that where no breach of trust or contract appears…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Utilities Commission v. . Trucking Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Lawrence Trust Co. v. Sun-American Publishing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  3. Patterson v. . HubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  4. Hargett v. Bell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Carolina Motor Service, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kold Kist, Inc. v. Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butchers Workmen of North AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Douglas Aircraft Co. v. Local Union 379 of International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Mayfair Farms, Inc. v. Socony Mobil Oil Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. City of Winston-Salem v. Winston-Salem City Coach Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Davis v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API