Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. McKinnon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1961No. 247PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The appellants assign as error the court’s refusal to sustain their exceptions to the Commission’s conclusions of law to the effect that it had jurisdiction of the subject matter and parties in this proceeding and had the power to make the requested investigation and to enter appropriate orders therein.

In our opinion, the Commission has the jurisdiction, under G.S. 62-121.45, G.S. 62-121.47 (2), and G.S. 62-121.48 (11), to investigate upon complaint or upon its own initiative without complaint, to determine whether any motor carrier is operating in violation of the provisions of the Bus Act…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gibson v. Central Manufacturers' Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Thomas & Howard Co. of Shelby, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Service Trucking Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BoydSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willett v. Chatham County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  2. North Carolina Motorcoach Ass'n Ex Rel. McGill, Inc. v. Guilford County Board of EducationDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Public Staff-North Carolina Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API