Legal Opinion

Carolina Motor Service, Inc. v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1936PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchenck, J.

The plaintiffs are contract truck carriers engaged in the transportation of gasoline and kerosene in intrastate commerce from the terminal port of Wilmington to certain interior points in North Carolina, and operating independently of public utility regulations. They contend that they are entitled to have enjoined the promulgation and the putting into effect of the proposed rates for two reasons, first, such rates are unjustly discriminatory and in violation of chapter 307, Public Laws of 1933, N. C. Code of 1935 (Michie), sec. 1112 (1) to (36), commonly known as the Public Utilities Act,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Patterson v. . HubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. Swain v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Hargett v. Bell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Holder v. Atlantic Joint-Stock Land BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Dare County v. MaterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Clinton v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Town of Clinton v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Burke Transit Co. v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API