Chambers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The City of Winston-Salem, acting through its proper authorities, adopted a zoning code and .appointed a Board of Adjustment as provided in G.S. 160-172 ¡and succeeding sections. By §48-2 of its zoning code, the city was divided into 10 “classes of districts,” four of which (A-1, A-2, B, ¡and C) are residential. The two first designated are the more restricted. The only difference in the building restrictions of zones A-l and A-2 .are set forth in paragraph (c) of the Zoning Code, §48-13 The section provides that after hearing, the Board of Adjustment may authorize the issuance of a permit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Belk's Department Store, Inc. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Harden v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Kinney v. SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Yancey v. HeafnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Jarrell v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF HIGH POINTSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- County of Durham v. AddisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Application of Rea Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Austin v. BrunnemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.