Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Zoning Board of Adjustment

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1959PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.

The City of Winston-Salem, acting through its proper authorities, adopted a zoning code and .appointed a Board of Adjustment as provided in G.S. 160-172 ¡and succeeding sections. By §48-2 of its zoning code, the city was divided into 10 “classes of districts,” four of which (A-1, A-2, B, ¡and C) are residential. The two first designated are the more restricted. The only difference in the building restrictions of zones A-l and A-2 .are set forth in paragraph (c) of the Zoning Code, §48-13 The section provides that after hearing, the Board of Adjustment may authorize the issuance of a permit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Belk's Department Store, Inc. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Harden v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. In Re Pine Hill Cemeteries, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Russ v. Board of Education of Brunswick CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Kinney v. SuttonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Yancey v. HeafnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Jarrell v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR CITY OF HIGH POINTSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. County of Durham v. AddisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. Application of Rea Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Austin v. BrunnemerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API