American Honda Finance Corp. v. Johnson
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
*165 Opinion
2Per curiam
The defendant, Marvel Johnson, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open the judgment rendered against him in favor of the plaintiff, American Honda Finance Corporation. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court’s denial of his motion to open reflects an abuse of discretion because he did not receive notice of the underlying action or of the judgment that resulted from that action until more than two years after the court rendered judgment against him. We are unable to review the merits of the defendant’s claim and, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Commissioner of Transportation v. KahnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Brehm v. BrehmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Rodriguez v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. LodriniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
4Cited by3 opinions
- Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Eremita v. MorelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Bankers Trust Co. v. PinciaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004