Legal Opinion

American Honda Finance Corp. v. Johnson

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 11, 2003No. AC 23625PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*165 Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Marvel Johnson, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open the judgment rendered against him in favor of the plaintiff, American Honda Finance Corporation. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court’s denial of his motion to open reflects an abuse of discretion because he did not receive notice of the underlying action or of the judgment that resulted from that action until more than two years after the court rendered judgment against him. We are unable to review the merits of the defendant’s claim and, therefore, affirm the judgment of the trial…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Transportation v. KahnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Brehm v. BrehmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. Rodriguez v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. LodriniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Eremita v. MorelloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Bankers Trust Co. v. PinciaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API