Legal Opinion
Bove v. Bove
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 10, 2003No. AC 22975PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*356 Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The defendant Howard W. Bove appeals from the judgment of partition by sale rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Kenneth Bove, concerning two parcels of land with the improvements thereon located in Thompson and Putnam.1 He maintains that (1) the court lacked jurisdiction to render a judgment of partition and (2) the court abused its discretion when it ordered partition by sale and denied the defendant’s motion to open the judgment. We agree that the court lacked jurisdiction and remand the case with direction to open the judgment.
We first set forth the pertinent procedural…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Hibner v. BrueningConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Bove v. BoveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- American Honda Finance Corp. v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Jimenez v. DeRosaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.