Legal Opinion
Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. Lodrini
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 12, 2003No. AC 23377PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant Virginia Lodrini1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, denying her motion to open the default judgment that was entered against her and to restore the case to the regular docket. On appeal, the defendant contends that the couit improperly (1) held that this court already had determined conclusively that the motion was not timely filed pursuant to General Statutes § 52-212 and (2) declined to afford her an evidentiary hearing on the motion to open the judgment, which motion was based on a claim of fraud on the court. We agree with the defendant and,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kenworthy v. KenworthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. LodriniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Mattson v. MattsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Davis v. FracassoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Jaser v. FischerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Honda Finance Corp. v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Moore v. FergusonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Mercedes-Benz Financial v. 1188 Stratford Avenue, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Tyler E. Lyman, Inc. v. LodriniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.