Legal Opinion
Brehm v. Brehm
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 18, 2001No. AC 20683PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant, Dana J. Brehm, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion to open the judgment of dissolution of his marriage to the plaintiff, Pamela B. Brehm. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court (1) improperly imposed conditions on the filing of his motion to open in violation of General Statutes § 52-212a,1 (2) violated his equal protection *700rights under the federal constitution by imposing on him conditions for filing a motion to open that other parties are not required to satisfy, (3) improperly rendered a judgment of dissolution on the same day that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Statewide Grievance Committee v. WhitneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Yale University v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Perez v. D AND L TRACTOR TRAILER SCHOOLConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Raymond v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Heim v. California Federal BankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Hunte v. Amica Mutual InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Loricco v. PantaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.