Legal Opinion
Loewenberg v. Schneider
California Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1939No. L. A. No. 16425PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
In this cause respondents move to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment upon the ground that no substantial question is presented for decision. The point is well taken.
By her amended complaint plaintiff sought to impress a trust upon certain real property in Los Angeles, to secure an accounting of rents, issues, and profits, and to recover damages for waste. Defendants answered, and also filed a cross-complaint. Trial of the cause resulted in judgment for defendant in the sum of $3,296.39. Plaintiff appealed.
It appears that plaintiff owned real property in Los Angeles which she…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beeson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Mills v. BradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Schultz v. City of VeniceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- City of Los Angeles v. MoyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holman v. TotenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Bisno v. HerzbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Maguire v. LeesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Fares v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Burns v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946