Holman v. Toten
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J., pro tem.
The defendant appeals from a judgment declaring plaintiff to be the owner of a described parcel of land and quieting plaintiff’s title thereto against all claims of defendant.
The points made by defendant on this appeal require a consideration of the evidence for their determination. Such consideration is much limited by the form of the record on appeal. The evidence is presented by a bill of exceptions which contains only certain documentary evidence introduced by the respective parties. The bill, after stating the plaintiff’s documentary evidence, declares that over…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Moore v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Whitney v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Lee v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hagge v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Todd v. VestermarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
- Johnson v. CasperIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
- Vierneisel v. Rhode Island Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.