Mills v. Brady
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. George E. Whitaker, Davis, Kemp & Post and Kemp & Clewett for Appellants. Heney & Carr, George E. Mills, Frank F. Oster, George J. Stoneman and Alfred H. McAdoo for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.
Two actions were brought, one by a plaintiff named Mills, and the other by a plaintiff named Bergman, against a number of persons as defendants. The two actions were consolidated and tried together, and judgment was given in favor of each plaintiff. The defendants appeal. The two actions are identical as to all matters pertinent to our discussion, and we may treat them as a single action.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the El Dorado Oil Company, a corporation, and has been unable to collect his judgment on execution, that the defendants respectively were the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Swift v. Occidental Mining & Petroleum Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Carter v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Bell v. StaackeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mazuran v. StefanichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Bogue v. RoethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Schultz v. City of VeniceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Smith v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Loewenberg v. SchneiderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.