Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Loucks

California Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1911No. S.F. No. 5625PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL, from a decree of the Superior Court of the County of Fresno distributing the estate of a deceased person and from an order refusing a new trial. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

The brothers and sisters of Wallace E. Loucks, deceased, prosecute an appeal from a decree of distribution whereby the entire estate of said Wallace E. Loucks was given to the estate of his deceased child Thelma G. Loucks for the benefit of her heirs at law, her maternal grandparents. There is also an appeal from the order denying the motion of said brothers and sisters of Wallace E. Loucks for a new trial.

Wallace E. Loucks, his wife Elsie May Loucks, and their infant daughter Thelma G. Loucks were killed in a collision between a railway train and the automobile in which they were passengers.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Evans v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. SamarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Connors v. SecordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. Ley v. BishoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Estate of WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Thomas v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Chalmers v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API