Legal Opinion

Schmitt v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 13, 1961No. 47537PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, Commissioner.

Otho Pierce and Lois Pierce, his wife, perished February 19, 1958, the result of an automobile collision. Each died intestate. The fact issues in the trial court were: Did one survive the other, or did they die simultaneously within the meaning of the Uniform Simultaneous Death Act, Chapter 471. (Statutory references are to RSMo 1949 and V.A.M.S.) Defendants make no point on appeal that there was sufficient evidence to establish that Mr. Pierce survived Mrs. Pierce. Mr. Pierce’s real and personal property was valued at well over $250,000. The two also held title to real…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Scanlon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Hamre v. CongerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. State ex rel. Baker v. BirdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  4. Cole v. Uhlmann Grain Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Walter v. AltSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Sidebottom v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Commonwealth v. GolstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Winters v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Smith v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Grindstaff v. TygettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API