Legal Opinion

People v. Samario

California Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1890No. 20570PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

The appellant was convicted of manslaughter for the killing of one Antonio Ninuccio. Several points are made upon the appeal.

1. It is contended that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.

It is not disputed that the defendant stabbed the deceased; and the uncontradicted evidence is, that the latter died from the effects of the wound within two days after receiving it. It is argued, however, that the defendant *485acted in self-defense. But if the evidence of Donati and Coppola is to be believed, he did not act in self-defense. And whether they were to be believed or not was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. People v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Perkins v. BlauthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Wheelock v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. PetruzoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Poindexter & Orr Live Stock Co. v. Oregon Short Line RailroadMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. In re Estate of WaxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API