Grand Lodge A. O. U. W. v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P. J.
This action was brought by plaintiff in interpleader to have the court determine as to who was entitled to $1,000 due by it under a policy or beneficial certificate issued'to William Peacock. The $1,000, was deposited with the clerk of the court to abide the result, and plaintiff thereafter had no further connection with the case. The court filed findings, and caused judgment to be entered in favor of defendant Ida Miller. From the judgment so entered this appeal is taken.
The facts out of which this controversy arose may be briefly stated as follows: William Peacock held a beneficial…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Estate of WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Morris v. MorrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- In Re the Estate of LoucksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Carpenter v. SeverinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.