Legal Opinion
Ley v. Bishopp
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 13, 1928No. Docket No. 6170PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.
An action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. A jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $750, and from the judgment entered thereon the defendant appeals.
It is contended as grounds for reversal that the verdict is unsupported and that the trial court erred in denying a motion for nonsuit, and by permitting certain tests to be made in the presence of the jury.
The defendant, a dental surgeon, was employed by the plaintiff to prepare for the use of the latter four removable bridges, and in the course of making certain…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. Tom WooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Neal v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barham v. WidingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.