De Voe v. Rundle
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered June 12, 1903, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff after a trial before the court without a jury, decreeing the foreclosure of a mortgage and denying the priority of defendant’s judgment lien.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
On the 17th day of June, 1901, the appellant, Eliza R. Runkle, obtained a judgment in King county, Washington, against Arthur De Voe for the sum. of $455 and costs. Her judgment became a lien upon the real estate of said De Voe in King county, on and after said *606date. ^>aid De Voe was, at that time, the holder of the legal title of record to lot 4, block 13, in the D. T. Denny Replat of Horth Seattle. He was also the holder of such title on the 21st day of December, 1891, at which time he executed a mortgage upon said lot to Eugene E. De Voe, of Chatauqua county, Hew York. The mortgage was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lord v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Wood v. GoodfellowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Belloc v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Brandenstein v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- George v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boucofski v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- North Spokane Irrigation District No. 8 v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1933
- R.O.I., Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Graves v. SeifriedUtah Supreme Court · 1906
- Thornely v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.