R.O.I., Inc. v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
R.O.I., Inc., brought this action to quiet title to certain property that its predecessors in interest purchased at a lien foreclosure sale. Summary judgment was entered for R.O.I. Hinton and Steel, Inc. (H & S), a judgment creditor, appeals.
H & S asserts it had neither actual nor constructive notice of the lien foreclosure action — a lis pendens not having been filed. H & S contends its judgment lien, although derived from a general creditor status and obtained after the foreclosure action was commenced, is a viable lien against the R.O.I. property. Resolution of this contention requires a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lamont v. . CheshireNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Dawson v. McCartyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Neill v. GrinerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Merrick v. PattisonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- May v. SutherlinWashington Supreme Court · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian NationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Cranwell v. MesecCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- In Re Proceedings of King County Foreclosure of LiensWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- United Savings & Loan Bank v. PallisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- United Savings and Loan Bank v. PallisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.