Wrightsville Winds Townhouses Homeowners' Ass'n v. Miller
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Although defendant brings forth a number of assignments of error, the essence of his appeal is that the evidence presented did not support the trial court’s finding that the disputed structures were built on common elements of the condominium property. Specifically, defendant attacks the testimony of Mr. Evans, a layman and homeowner in the Association. Mr. Evans’ testimony conflicted with statements of defendant’s witness, a land surveyor, who testified that the structures were built on limited common areas. Defendant argues that in light of the testimony of his “expert,” the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Robins & Weill, Inc. v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Barrier v. TroutmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. KirkhartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Precision Walls, Inc. v. ServieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Association of Owners of Regency Park Condominiums v. ThomassonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
- Copypro, Inc. v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.