Ingle v. Stubbins

DEPENDANT’S APPEAL.

Winbobne, J.

The sole question presented by tbe appeal of defendant, as stated in brief of attorneys filed in this Court for him, is whether or not tbe construction of tbe residence building on tbe lot in question nearer than fifty feet to Bueno Street or Wildwood Lane, — a fact agreed, — is in violation of the restrictive covenants here involved. Tbe trial court ruled that it was violation of paragraph four. And this Court now approves.

Tbe subject of restrictive covenants has been recently considered and treated by this Court in opinion by Johnson, J., in tbe case of…