Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, C. J.
When considered alone the facts set forth in the plaintiff’s complaint might be regarded as sufficient to invoke the aid of equity to prevent injustice and to forestall advantage being taken by one of two equal owners in the operation of the essential railroad facilities of the defendant Bridge Company, but as equity follows the law we think the final determination of the matters complained of should abide the plenary presentation of both sides of the controverted questions rather than that the court should attempt to decide the issues by a ruling on a preliminary injunction. The time for…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Clinard v. LambethSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Davis v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Ingle v. StubbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Roberts v. Madison County Realtors Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Wrightsville Winds Townhouses Homeowners' Ass'n v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.