Barrier v. Troutman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The trial leading up to the verdict was without exception. The defendants did not appeal, and the plaintiff’s appeal brings up only his exception to the denial of his motion for an injunction based upon the verdict of the jury.
Remedy by the ancient writ of nuisance has long since been superseded under the code by civil action for damages, or for removal of the nuisance, or both. G.S. 1-539. And the rule is established that for a public nuisance where rights and privileges common to the public or to all the people of the community are injuriously interfered with, no action lies in favor of an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Fifth Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Delta Air Corporation v. KerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Turner v. . ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Airport Authority v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Kent v. HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Morgan v. High Penn Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.