Legal Opinion

Fry v. Young

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1968No. Nov. 12, 1968PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRegan, J.

In an unpublished opinion, this court affirmed the order of the trial court granting all defendants a new trial. Shortly thereafter,-the code provisions (Code Civ. Proc., §§657, 660) governing the timeliness and contents of new trial orders were reviewed by the State Supreme Court in a trilogy of cases—Siegal v. Superior Court, 68 Cal.2d 97 [65 Cal.Rptr. 311, 436 P.2d 311]; Mercer v. Perez, 68 Cal.2d 104 [65 Cal.Rptr. 315, 436 P.2d 315], and Treber v. Superior Court, 68 Cal.2d 128 [65 Cal.Rptr. 330, 436 P.2d 330], By direction of the Supreme Court, the appeal is here again for reconsideration…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Willis v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Fergus v. SongerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Myers v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Herman v. ShandorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API