Fry v. Young
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtRegan, J.
In an unpublished opinion, this court affirmed the order of the trial court granting all defendants a new trial. Shortly thereafter,-the code provisions (Code Civ. Proc., §§657, 660) governing the timeliness and contents of new trial orders were reviewed by the State Supreme Court in a trilogy of cases—Siegal v. Superior Court, 68 Cal.2d 97 [65 Cal.Rptr. 311, 436 P.2d 311]; Mercer v. Perez, 68 Cal.2d 104 [65 Cal.Rptr. 315, 436 P.2d 315], and Treber v. Superior Court, 68 Cal.2d 128 [65 Cal.Rptr. 330, 436 P.2d 330], By direction of the Supreme Court, the appeal is here again for reconsideration…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Boynton v. McKalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Malkasian v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Newton v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Oakland Raiders v. National Football LeagueCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Willis v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Fergus v. SongerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Myers v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Herman v. ShandorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.