Burch v. Wargo

See Burch v. Wargo, Mich App 365. Upon leave granted the plaintiff administrator reviews determination by the Court of Appeals that the “Restrictive Indorsement” of the first policy excluded liability of the garnishee for payment of the judgment entered in the principal suit. 1

The indorsement on its face is free from ambiguity or doubt. The consequential question is whether the insurer and the insured agreed with pertinent effectiveness that “the terms of this indorsement shall remain applicable upon any subsequent renewal or renewals of this policy.” Preliminary to review of this question it…