Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance Company
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, P. J.
We are asked in this case to determine whether the so-called “innocent third party” rule, which this Court established in State Farm Mut Auto *768Ins Co v Kurylowicz,1 survived our Supreme Court’s decision in Titan Ins Co v Hyten.2 We conclude that it did not.
Plaintiff, Ali Bazzi (plaintiff), is seeking to recover personal protection insurance (PIP) benefits for injuries he sustained in an automobile accident while driving a vehicle owned by third-party defendant Hala Bazzi (plaintiffs mother).3 Intervening plaintiffs, Genex Physical Therapy, Inc., Elite Chiropractic Center, PC, and Transmedic,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
- Titan Insurance Company v. HytenMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
- Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RuuskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. Ann Arbor Charter TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
- Meemic Insurance Company v. Louise M FortsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Rachel Amy Maurer v. Fremont Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Southeast Michigan Surgical Hospital, LLC v. Allstate Insurance Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2016
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Michigan Municipal Risk Management AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.