Legal Opinion

Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. Sheffield

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 2, 1979No. 78-1765, 78-1771PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

375 So.2d 598 (1979)

HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant,

v.

Inez SHEFFIELD, Appellee.

Nos. 78-1765, 78-1771.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

October 2, 1979.

Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellant.

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward A. Perse, Brumer, Cohen, Logan, Kandell & Redlus, Miami, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY and SCHWARTZ, JJ.

SCHWARTZ, Judge.

The defendant insurance company appeals from a summary declaratory judgment holding that it was required to provide uninsured motorist protection to its insured, who was the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Hartford Fire Insurance v. WalshIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. DeJernette v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  5. Aurora Fire & Marine Insurance v. KranichMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Makela v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Beauchamp Ex Rel. Beauchamp v. Southwestern National Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  4. Maxwell v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Sentry Ins. v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API