Legal Opinion

Titan Insurance Company v. Hyten

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2012No. Docket 142774PublishedCited by 175 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkman, J.

We granted leave to appeal to address whether an insurance carrier may avail itself of traditional legal and equitable remedies to avoid liability under an insurance policy on the ground of fraud in the application for insurance, when the fraud was easily ascertainable and the claimant is a third party. In accordance with this Court’s precedent in Keys v Pace, 358 Mich 74; 99 NW2d 547 (1959), we answer this question in the affirmative. There being nothing in the law to warrant the establishment of an “easily ascer*551tamable” rule, we overrule State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co v Kurylowicz, 67 Mich App…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Terrien v. ZwitMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Eggleston v. Bio-Medical Applications of Detroit, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by175 opinions

  1. Ali Bazzi v. Sentinel Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2018
  2. SFS Check, LLC v. First Bank of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  3. Barclae v. ZarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Garcia v. Chrysler Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  5. John MacDonald, Jr. v. Thomas M. Cooley Law SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

170 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API