Legal Opinion

Jacqueline Benjamin v. B & H Education

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 2017No. 15-17147PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: ’

Plaintiffs are students of cosmetology and hair design at schools in California and Nevada operated by defendant B&H Education, Inc., under the name of Mari-riello Schools of Beauty. Plaintiffs claim that they are employees within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and under California and Nevada state law, on the ground that much of their time is spent in menial and unsupervised work, and that they are therefore entitled to ' compensation. The District Court granted summary judgment for B&H on the FLSA claim, holding that under the test…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  3. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Gary Merchant v. Corizon Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  2. Velarde v. GW GJ, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. Sakyi v. Estée Lauder Cos.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Mark Fochtman v. Hendren Plastics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  5. Lamar Dawson v. NcaaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API