Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCantil-Sakauye, C.J.
*5 *912 Under both California and federal law, the question whether an individual worker should properly be classified as an employee or, instead, as an independent contractor has considerable significance for workers, businesses, and the public generally. On the one **5 hand, if *913 a worker should properly be classified as an employee, the hiring business bears the responsibility of paying federal Social Security and payroll taxes, unemployment insurance taxes and state employment taxes, providing worker's compensation insurance, and, most relevant for the present case, complying with numerous state…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Sarah Murphy v. Sfbsc Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Cta v. Rob BontaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Ward v. United Airlines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2020
- Gerardo Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising Int'l Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Cal. Trucking Ass'n v. Julie SuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.