Legal Opinion

United America v. Eghbal

District Court, C.D. California

Decided February 14, 2007No. CV 06-1091JFWFMOXPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALTER, District Judge.

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [filed 12/11/06; Docket No. 57]; AND VACATING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES

On December 11, 2006, Plaintiff United States of America (“Plaintiff’ or the “Government”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”). On December 26, 2006, Defendants Morteza Eghbal and Marilyn Trujillo (collectively “Defendants”) filed their Opposition. On January 3, 2007, Plaintiff filed a Reply. Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and'Local Rule 7-15, the Court found the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Thomas v. Siemens AGDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. United States v. Nancy SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. MWI Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. NARIO v. NATIONAL ONDEMAND, INC.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022
  5. Purcell v. Mwi CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API