Legal Opinion

NARIO v. NATIONAL ONDEMAND, INC.

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided April 27, 2022No. 1:21-cv-00711Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA VANESSA NARIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:21CV711 ) NATIONAL ONDEMAND, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OSTEEN, JR., District Judge Before this court is a Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. 8), filed by Defendant National OnDemand, Inc. Defendant argues Plaintiff Vanessa Nario failed to adequately allege facts plausibly showing she engaged in protected activity under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), so she is not entitled to relief. (Doc. 9 at 4–9.) For the following reasons, this court will grant the motion.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Roman Zak v. Chelsea Therapeutics InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
  5. Kathleen A. Shanaghan v. John D. Cahill Cahill & Associates, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API