Legal Opinion

United States v. Halper

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 15, 1989No. 87-1383PublishedCited by 1,720 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Blackmun

In this case, we consider whether and under what circumstances a civil penalty may constitute “punishment” for the purposes of double jeopardy analysis.1

*437I

Respondent Irwin Halper worked as manager of New City Medical Laboratories, Inc., a company which provided medical service in New York City for patients eligible for benefits under the federal Medicare program. In that capacity, Halper submitted to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Greater New York, a fiscal intermediary for Medicare, 65 separate false claims for reimbursement for service rendered. Specifically, on 65 occasions during 1982 and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,720 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

1,715 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API