United States v. Nancy Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
In this appeal, we consider whether a criminal forfeiture action constitutes an “alternate remedy” to a civil qui tam action under the False Claims Act, entitling a relator to intervene in the criminal action and recover a share of the proceeds pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(5). We hold that it does not, and we affirm the district court’s order denying intervention.
I
The criminal defendant, Neil Van Dyck, was a licensed podiatrist who owned and operated his own podiatry practice until October 2014. Relator Wendy Johnson worked as a medical assistant for Van Dyck…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. John A. WalczakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. James WegelerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- United States v. John Patrick Couch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- D'Anna v. Capstone Medical Resources LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
- GUARDIOLA v. RENOWN HEALTHDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Griffith v. ConnDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020