Legal Opinion

United States v. Nancy Smith

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2017No. 16-10160PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

In this appeal, we consider whether a criminal forfeiture action constitutes an “alternate remedy” to a civil qui tam action under the False Claims Act, entitling a relator to intervene in the criminal action and recover a share of the proceeds pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(5). We hold that it does not, and we affirm the district court’s order denying intervention.

I

The criminal defendant, Neil Van Dyck, was a licensed podiatrist who owned and operated his own podiatry practice until October 2014. Relator Wendy Johnson worked as a medical assistant for Van Dyck…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Linda R. S. v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Linda RS v. Richard D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Zamani v. CarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. John A. WalczakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. James WegelerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. John Patrick Couch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
  3. D'Anna v. Capstone Medical Resources LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  4. GUARDIOLA v. RENOWN HEALTHDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
  5. Griffith v. ConnDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API