Legal Opinion · Dissent

Radford v. Gaukler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1917No. Docket No. 124PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Wayne; Chester, J., presiding. Assumpsit by George W. Radford against Josephine Gaukler, survivor of herself and Arthur H. Gaukler, deceased, upon two promissory notes. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1DissentMoore, J.

Plaintiff brought suit on two promissory notes for $5,000 each made by Josephine Gaukler and Arthur H. Gaukler, dated October 21, 1911, and due October 1, 1912. The defendant, in the notice attached to her plea of the general issue, set *95up several defenses. At the close of the evidence each of the parties moved for a directed verdict. The court denied both of the motions, and submitted one question only to the jury, namely: Were the notes procured by fraud ? The verdict of the jury was for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for judgment in his favor non obstante veredicto, pursuant to Act No.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. People v. SartoriMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Druck v. Antrim Lime Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Kelly v. GauklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Day v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API