Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Gaukler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1911No. Docket No. 12PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Wayne; Erskine, J., presiding. Assumpsit by William T. Kelly against Francis O. Gaukler and the Electric City Amusement Company on an appeal bond. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an action of assumpsit brought by William T. Kelly as assignee of Carl E. Schmidt upon the appeal bond in a chancery cause given by defendant Electric City Amusement Company with defendant Francis O. Gaukler as surety in Schmidt v. Gaukler, 156 Mich. 243 (120 N. W. 746).

Without commenting upon counsel’s criticism of the declaration, we gather from the findings of the circuit judge, before whom this cause was tried, the following history of the cause: On September 19, 1907, one Carl E. Schmidt filed his bill of complaint in the circuit court for the county of Wayne, in chancery,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kountze v. Omaha Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Johnson v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Mickle v. MaxfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Vaughan v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Howe v. LemonMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Stewart v. IsbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Lutz v. DutmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Kollen v. SooyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Wurzer v. GeraldineMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API