Legal Opinion

Day v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1922No. Docket No. 95Published

Error to superior court of Grand Rapids; Dunham (Major L.), J. Case by Jessie Day against the Grand Rapids Railway Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

Action for personal injuries. Defendant with its plea gave notice of settlement of the claim, that defendant had paid plaintiff $115, and had paid her doctor’s bill, which had been accepted by plaintiff in full satisfaction and discharge of liability and that she had signed a release accordingly. Plaintiff claimed a continuing injury and disability following the accident. After plaintiff had consulted a physician a number of times and after he had declined to express an opinion of when she would be able to return to work, she was approached by a claim agent of defendant with whom the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Marple v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  2. Bertha v. Regal Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Parnell v. PungsMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wulff v. BosslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Yerkes v. Antrim Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API