Legal Opinion
United States v. Franzione
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 5, 1923No. 3812PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Acting Associate Justice.
A libel was filed by the United States in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, alleging that certain malt extract, mal't syrup, hops, bottle openers, corks, and other like property were then in the possession of one Pranzione at certain premises in the District of Columbia; that the articles were designed and intended for use in the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor for beverage purposes, in violation of sections 18 and 25 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 313, 315); and praying that a warrant issue for the seizure of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. YuginovichSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. HydesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
- Crowder v. Fletcher & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
- United States ex rel. Soeder v. CrossenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1920
- United States v. One Cadillac Eight AutomobileDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Strong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- Ghisolfo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- United States v. Specified Quantities of Intoxicating LiquorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Utah Liquor Control Commission v. WoorasUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- Quandt Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.