United States v. Specified Quantities of Intoxicating Liquors
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). Whether these prohibition matters are properly treated like revenue seizures, or whether eases like this, called by the amazing name of “common-law libels in rem,” are forbidden (United States v. Franzione, 286 F. 769, 52 App. D. C. 307) by the statute, are questions suggested but not raised by this record.
If the facts shown without contradiction on the motion herein had been proved at a trial, the libel would have been dismissed as of course; so the only real questions raised by this writ are these: (1) Can such a motion as this be made? or (2) Did the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. FranzioneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
- Cavalliotis v. La Fonciere de France et des ColoniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Eight Boxes Containing Various Articles of Miscellaneous MerchandiseCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Ghisolfo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- In Re Phoenix Cereal Beverage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Avignone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- Castro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1927
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.