United States v. Hydes
District Court, W.D. Washington
Criminal prosecution by the United States against A. Hydes. On motion for forfeiture of automobile.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The defendant was convicted of transporting intoxicating liquor in violation of the National Prohibition Act (41 Stat. 305), several gallons of alcohol. At the time of transportation the liquor was seized by an officer. The defendant was not arrested. About 10 days thereafter the defendant was arrested on a warrant duly issued, and the automobile in which the liquor was transported was seized without process, and forfeiture is demanded.
The right of the government to forfeit the automobile is challenged by the owner upon the ground that it was seized without warrant of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. Two Hundred & Sixty-Seven Twenty-Dollar Gold PiecesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1919
- United States v. One Certain Six-Passenger, Six-Cylinder, Forty-Eight Horse Power LocomobileDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1917
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. SlusserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1921
- Ghisolfo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Wells v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
- GoodhopeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
- United States v. FranzioneDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.