Legal Opinion
Ghisolfo v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1926No. 4795PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This was a proceeding by libel to condemn a large quantity of intoxicating liquor and property designed for its manufacture. From a decree in favor of the libelant the claimant has appealed.
The proceeding was instituted under section 25 of title 2 of the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138%m), which provides as follows:
“Sec. 25. It shall be unlawful to have or possess any liquor or property designed for the manufacture of liquor intended for use in violating this title or which has been so used, and no property rights shall exist in any sucfi liquor or property.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. SlusserDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1921
- Daeufer-Lieberman Brewing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- United States v. HydesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
- United States v. Specified Quantities of Intoxicating LiquorsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- United States v. LoomisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Strong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1931
- State v. AlawayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Com. v. J. Irland Smith and Wesson 9MM Semi-Automatic Pistol, Serial PDW0493Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hannifin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- United States v. Charles D. Kaier Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.