Legal Opinion
Utah Liquor Control Commission v. Wooras
Utah Supreme Court
Decided August 10, 1939No. 6016PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LARSON, Justice.
Utah Liquor Control Commission, hereinafter called libel-ant, as plaintiff, commenced in the District Court of Carbon County an action in libel against defendants, hereinafter called libelees, to confiscate certain tangible personal property as used in violation of the State Liquor Control Act. Chapter 43, Laws of Utah 1935, as amended by Chapter 49, Laws of Utah 1937. From an adverse decision libelant appeals. Two questions are presented for determination: (1) Were the issues raised by the pleadings such as to make relevant and material certain testimony excluded by the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- The Moses TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Coffey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Thatcher v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. HarkerUtah Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. TraneUtah Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AlawayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Com. v. J. Irland Smith and Wesson 9MM Semi-Automatic Pistol, Serial PDW0493Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- State v. MooreSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.