Legal Opinion

Greydanus v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1965No. L.A. No. 28499PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMosk, J.

The petitioners in this proceeding seek review and annulment of an award of compensation to respondent Dominique Basterretche. The facts are both uncomplicated and undisputed and, for our purposes, may be readily summarized :

Basterretche was permanently employed to milk cows at the dairy operated by petitioner R. G. Greydanus. As required, he reported for work each morning at 4:30 a.m. at the milking bam situated beside a two-lane highway near Chino. In order to reach the barn it was necessary to turn off the highway into a short driveway leading to the barn. On the morning of March 20, 1963,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Barnett v. Britling Cafeteria Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Nelson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  5. Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Laeng v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. General Insurance Co. of America v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Dixon v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API