Legal Opinion
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided November 1, 1934No. S. F. 15025PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
This application for certiorari must be sustained, as will appear from a consideration of the fundamental limits set by the law establishing the workmen’s compensation system (Act 4749, Deering’s Gen. Laws, pp. 2272 et seq.).
Petitioner is the Postal Telegraph Cable Company, a corporation. Respondents are the Industrial Accident Commission and Chas. Rudy Mahret, who was in the employ of petitioner as a motorcycle messenger. Said employee was injured in a traffic collision at Geary Street and Presidio Avenue, San Francisco, on August 31, 1932, while going from his home at 1728 Anza Street,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- American Indemnity Co. v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- California C. I. Exch. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1923
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Smith.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Larson v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Watson v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Greydanus v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Breland v. Traylor Engineering & Manufacturing, Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Garzoli v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.