Legal Opinion

General Insurance Co. of America v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1976No. L.A. 30542PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CLARK, J.

Petitioner seeks review of a workers’ compensation award to an employee’s widow contending the going and coming rule precludes her recovery.

Edward Chairez, the deceased, was employed as a delivery and service man, his work day commencing at 8 a.m., including Saturday. He commuted to work in his personal automobile, departing from his residence at approximately 7:30 a.m. The employer did not compensate its employees for their commute expense or for their activities prior to 8 a.m.

*598The employer’s place of business is on South La Cienega Boulevard in Los Angeles. The few parking…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cal. Cas. Ind. Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Santa Rosa Junior College v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Childers v. Shasta Livestock Auction Yard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Hartline v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API