General Insurance Co. of America v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CLARK, J.
Petitioner seeks review of a workers’ compensation award to an employee’s widow contending the going and coming rule precludes her recovery.
Edward Chairez, the deceased, was employed as a delivery and service man, his work day commencing at 8 a.m., including Saturday. He commuted to work in his personal automobile, departing from his residence at approximately 7:30 a.m. The employer did not compensate its employees for their commute expense or for their activities prior to 8 a.m.
*598The employer’s place of business is on South La Cienega Boulevard in Los Angeles. The few parking…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hinojosa v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Freire v. Matson Navigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Cal. Cas. Ind. Exch. v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Littlefield v. Pillsbury Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Santa Rosa Junior College v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Childers v. Shasta Livestock Auction Yard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Hartline v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.