Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Conn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1885No. 11,703PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Cass Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

The first error of which complaint is here made on behalf of appellant, the defendant below, is the overruling of its demurrer to the first paragraph of appellee’s complaint.

In this first paragraph, the appellee' alleged that the appellant was a railroad corporation, doing business in this State under and by virtue of the laws thereof, and owned, controlled and operated its railroad from Logansport, Indiana, to Chicago, Illinois, in and through the town of Royal Center, in Cass county, and its railroad was laid and constructed ■over and across North street, in such town of Royal Center; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. HensilIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. City of Greencastle v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Cincinnati, Wabash & Michigan Railroad v. PetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Cones v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. City of Logansport v. KihmIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API