Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. Young

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1896No. 17,931PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Prom the Sullivan Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The appellee sued and recovered for personal injuries sustained by him in a collision of a train with his wagon at the crossing of a highway and the railway of the then Ohio & Mississippi Railway Company, since consolidated with other companies, and constituting the appellant.

The complaint alleged that the crossing was upon a sharp descending grade, and the railway for a half mile north of the crossing ran through a cut thirty feet deep; that two hundred feet east of the highway and within twenty feet of the railway was a large, tall frame building which obstructed a view to the railway by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. StickIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. GallentineIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. DuncanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. McKeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1866

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ConoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Nickey v. SteuderIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. PetersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. TauerIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API