Legal Opinion

City of Greencastle v. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 7578PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Putnam Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Bicknell, C.

The city of Greencastle had an ordinance to prevent certain animals from running at large in the city. The ordinance required the city marshal to take up and impound such animals, and to give immediate notice thereof by posting ; and, if the owner should fail to appear within forty-eight hours after the posting, then to sell the animals, etc. Under this ordinance, the city marshal took up and impounded the appellee’s mare, and kept her in the city pound, from Monday until the next Friday morning, without any posting or offer to sell; and then the mare jumped over the pound fence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brinkmeyer v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Fent v. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Pennsylvania Co. v. HensilIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. The Rochester White Lead Co. v. . the City of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  5. Lloyd v. . the Mayor, C. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Marv Hixon D/B/A Hixon Home Improvement, and American States Insurance Company v. Sherwin-Williams CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. City of Kokomo v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Robinson v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Alexander v. Town of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API